Why I’m now voting ‘yes’ on March 3

February 4th, 2011

There is so much talk about what new initiatves the Assembly will be able to introduce if there is a yes vote. That is not why I will be voting yes – I will be voting yes because of all the power it will have to repeal many the laws made at Westminister that took our rights away.

In 1346 the people of Llantrisant were granted a town charter, which meant we had our own government, our own courts of law, and didn’t have to pay what is the equivilant of business rates today.

I went to bed one night planning to vote no, fearing abuse of power and woke up the next day dreaming of freedom. If a stubborn minded person like me with High Functioning Autism can change their mind from planning to vote no to planning to yes overnight because they dared to dream of regaining the freedom their ancestors enjoy – then the people of Wales can do the same.

A yes vote in March will mean in May for the first time since 1535 Wales will be able to make its own primary legislation without asking England. Not a decade has passed where Westminster hasn’t stripped Welsh people of their civil rights. Voting yes in March will mean in 20 areas the Assembly will have the powers to repeal many of the repressive laws introduced by the authoritarian governments at Westminster.
The Assembly since 1999 has shown it can be trusted with power. It has introduced bus passes for elderly and disabled people, making prescriptions free for all, introducing the Home Energy Efficency Scheme so poor people can afford to keep warm, and giving additional funding to Victim Support and Help the Aged to help the vulnerable.

I am going to vote Yes, in the hope that even it it takes it takes the 30 years it did to create the Assembly, that one day I will, through the same democratic process in Northern Ireland, be able to convince the Assembly to give the Freemen Llantrisant our freedom back – Even if it doesn’t have the powers in May after a yes vote to do it in March, it will still have LCO powers to request them.

A science fiction story about the Welsh Assembly Referendum in 2011

February 2nd, 2011

It is April 1 2011. Just under a month ago, the Welsh Assembly was awarded primary legislative powers, in an overwhelming victory for the Yes campaign.

After having read a letter in the South Wales Evening Post a few months earlier, Sean Connery pours his millions into hiring the best lawyers to fulfil his independence dreams. The Supreme Court, considering UK and European constitutional law rules that because Wales and Scotland are unicameral nations, needing only permission of the Queen to make a law, they should be considered sovereign nations and therefore independent.

Panic strikes Downing Street. Depty Prime Minister Nick Clegg frantically calls his Prime Minister David Cameron: ‘Dave, Dave, we’ve lost control of Wales and Scotland – the Courts said we can’t control them anymore, what can we do?’. “Calm down Nick, calm Nick, I’m sure there’s something” – “You could be right Dave – YES THERE IS! I remember learning at my exclusive school in Westminster that when people elect a Parliament it can do whatever it wants, and overrule the Courts’, ‘So Nick, we can put a Bill through Parliament and reverse the decision? But won’t the public hate us?”, “Don’t you worry yourself Dave, I’m fully prepare for this – I did a degree in Social Anthropology at the elite Cambridge University, there is nothing about manipulating the people I don’t know about”, “Ok, but what about Churchill, he sent in the troops, I don’t want to be as hated as he is”, “He was both Conservative and Liberal Dave, only hated in his time – the silly sops voted him their greatest Briton recently, so they’ll forgive us”

Days later, emergency legislation is in Parliament. The news hits Cardiff – The Plaid/Labour administration goes into disarray. There are mass protests on the streets. Government buildings are trashed, police are hospitalised as they lose control, refuse goes uncollected for weeks, sewer systems burst, filling the streets with sewerage, there are sounds of children crying, dogs howling, and police sirens wailing.

The Prime Minister declares a State of Emergency, but continues to push his legislation through. The House of Lords does everything in its  power to stop it, from making amendment after amendment, debate after debate, but each time the old Etonian and Westminster boys send it back. They make no changes, after the third attempt it goes through and becomes law. Wales is now under full control of the Secretary of State for Wales.

The Government send in the Army, for many people it is like the Tonypandy riots and miners strikes rolled into one, but with greater intensity. The UN gets involved and issues a resolution against the United Kingdom. David Cameron, using every trick he learned on the playing fields of Eton clings to power. Peace keepers enter the UK, trying to restore order.

The UK is in disarray, the whole world is watching. Iran place sanctions on all UK arms imports. China dismisses the repressive nature of United Kingdom politics as the most abhorrent in history. All Northern Ireland parties issue a statement calling on the people of Wales and Scotland to cease their violence and engage in peaceful negotiation.

In the mists of what might be Wales and the UK’s darkest hour since the Second World War, two businessmen, from modest backgrounds consider the implications. One of them, Lord Alan Sugar, upset and disgusted about how powerless he was to stop the law going through Parliament, because of a centuries old Act of Parliament that didn’t even go through the Lords before getting Royal Assent. Feeling in a state of guilt, he looks through all the news to see what started it all, and whether there was anything that could have been done different. He comes across a report of how Sean Connery used the Supreme Court to change things, and thought that he could try to do the same.

He contacts his friend, Michael Moritz, fellow state-school educated entrepreneur and millionaire. They hire the same lawyers, who worked on Sean Connery’s case. Some of them were graduates from former polytechnics, only getting as far as they could because Labour introduced tuition fees so their university was able to provide more places on their law courses. Some of them had only got as far as they did, because they went to school when the Assisted Places scheme was in place, so even though their parents were poor, they could have access to private education, which made it easier for them to get into Oxford, without the snobbery that they went to a state school that others experience.

Months later, after argument after argue, legal case citation after legal citation, the Supreme Court rules that for the reason that one House of Parliament has no greater supremacy than the other and in considering the balance been conflict case law and precedent, that the decision that manifestos carry ‘no legitimate expectations’ should be reversed, and the rule that one House cannot obstruct the other if there is a manifesto commitment should be interpreted to mean that an Act of Parliament should not be passed unless it is part of a manifesto commitment.

As both Houses are now equal, the Queen calls upon Baroness Thatcher and asks her if she wants to form a government – she agrees. Both Chambers quickly agree a Constitutional Reform Act. A referendum is held in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, on whether the House of Lords and Commons should be merged and called the ‘House of Representatives’, which consider of citizen’s appointed on the basis of the national parliament’s individual criteria for recognising the people who have made the greatest contribution and sacrifices for society. Parliaments are proposed in England, Scotland, and Wales, and their Bills have to be pass both the national legislative and Westminister’s House of Representatives, with Northern Ireland staying unchanged. It also proposes that ultimate sovereignty should reside in the Supreme Court, not in the national legislatures, House of Representatives, nor or the newly created directly elected Executive, who can’t transfer any power to Europe or any other international body, without the treaties first being scrutinised by the House of Representatives, and only then after an resolution being passed in each of the legislatures in Northern Ireland, Wales, Scotland and England.

There is a resounding ‘Yes’ vote. UN peace keepers leave, and early elections are held, for the first ever directly elected Prime Minister, the first cabinet appointed by proportional representation, and elections to legislative bodies. For the first time in history, power is given to the judiciary over politicians, control to the British nations and Northern Ireland who are affected by the decisions is consider by the European Court of Human Rights as the level at which margins of appreciation are assessed. The public are granted protection from each legislature’s politicians and the Prime Minister and his Executive, through all laws having to be agreed by the ordinary people at the House of Representatives in Westminster and subject to interpretation of  the Supreme Court in Middlesex Guildhall on London’s Parliament Square, under the principle of ‘proportionality’.

There’s a novel in every taxi driver – there’s a degree to get out of every novel

February 2nd, 2011

People are always saying to me ‘not everyone can have a degree, as some people have to do the menial work’. I don’t see the two as mutually exclusive – my best friend’s girlfriend has a degree – a 2:1, and she’s enjoying spending time with him, her family and friends, with no worry and responsibility, doing a customer service job at Sainsbury’s. Many people pity her, but I am proud of her. She’s not like other people who would turn their nose up at a job because they don’t think someone with a degree should be doing that sort of work.

Shouldn’t say this I know, but if it wasn’t for the Second World War, which gave women the chance to work for the first time, the determination of the Suffragettes, to set into action a chain over events which made her the humble, determined with a strong work ethic, she could be stuck at home now, jobless, without a Higher Education, with the only thing to do being to tidy her house and watch TV. Some people may still be in this position today, and content with it – but if they’re not, then they need to know that in my egalitarian society there would be a way out:

A surgeon can be paid £125,000 a year, and a taxi-driver a lot less. The doctor is richer that the taxi driver. However, the taxi driver has experienced the world though other people’s daily lives, the surgeon just the end of a cold scalpel. The surgeon may be information and monetary wealthy, and the taxi driver poor, but…

Take a look at this degree at the University of Glamorgan where I graduated from.

We all know that every taxi driver has a novel in them. In my ‘egalitarian society’ the low paid taxi driver (with few qualifications and responsibilities) would still be a low paid taxi driver, the high paid surgeon (with lots of qualifications and experience) would still be a high paid surgeon, due to market forces. BUT, some of the tax they pay could be given to the taxi driver, so if they wanted they could get this degree from Glamorgan, as it may be that the only thing stopping them writing that novel bursting with energy inside. They could then go back to being a taxi driver, doing the job they love, ignoring all the snobs who say ‘why are you a taxi driver if you have a degree?’ and get working on his next novel.

Will the Assembly have more tax powers after March 3

February 2nd, 2011

After March 3 in 2011, some or all of the Welsh voters will have cast thir vote yes, in favour if of the Assembly being able to make any law on any thing it wants. If you haven’t made up your mind yet, you don’t want any more rights taken away from you that governemnt after government has been doing, then you should vote no.

At the moment, if the Assembly wanted introduce a cogestion charge in Cardiff with CCTV picking up all the route the cars took, it would more than likey have to ask Wesminister first. A yes vote in March means they will no longer have to go Wesminister first, if they want to pass a draconian law that restricts the public’s freedoms. I know they are willing to do this – it happended to my family. They believed in deovoultion long before the rulling classes thought it might be a good way of jerrymandering the constution to make if difficult for party than another.

You could be right Carwyn, but without a second chamber, the Assembly will be able to pass any law it wants, even if it was not in a manifesto, and even if the pubic were against it. In Westminister, if the Government wants to pass a law th……at wasn’t in their manifesto.
My MP Owen Smith and prospective AM Mick Antoniw, went up to London to protest again the Government plans to increase tuition fees. The Lib Dem’s policy was to abolish fees, and many people voted for that policy.

What is stopping the Assembly, when it gets powers to make primary legislation in the same way Parliament has, introducing tuition fees for college courses, requiring identity cards to be presented in order for someone to use public transport; or requiring anyone earning over £50,000 a to pay for their healthcare instead of having it for free? If people vote ‘yes’ on March 3 the Welsh politicians can do all these things – if they vote no then Welsh politicians won’t have the same powers as their Westminster counterparts to take away more and more of our rights. If people vote ‘yes’ they will be opening up the floodgates to civil disorder and mass protests, when the power goes to the Welsh politicians’ heads and they become just as authoritarian as the successive governments in power at Westminster than I have witnessed during my lifetime.

My feelings on the NHS, My vision for it’s future

February 2nd, 2011

My grandfather, who is nearly 100, is in hospital with a life threatening condition. All the family are worried. He is from the Rhondda. We thought putting on some music about the Rhondda would help, but it starting bringing us to tears. When I try to rationalise it, I think how lucky my grand-dad is that we have the NHS. He is a pensioner who doesn’t even own his own home. He was a miner, so is lucky to have not died from a different condition earlier. He has limited wealth, and all his children, including my dad are also pensioners, so they would never be able to afford to pay for him to be treated – without the NHS he would be dead now.

The Conservatives voted against the NHS, Cameron said it was his top priority. I hope he’s genuine, and won’t introduce a privitisation programme.

I don’t think any private sector firm should be allowed to run a public service organization on a monopoly basis. But here is what might seem like a contradiction – I don’t think the government or State should have a monopoly on healthcare either. Let me tell you why I feel the way I feel, it makes me sad and angry thinking about it.

Both of my grandmothers died in State-run hospitals that I don’t feel operated to the highest ethical standards. My paternal grandmother died from lack of fluids, and a hospital bug, and my paternal one because she wasn’t given enough information to give informed consent. Both appeared sedated when I would visit them during the day . They were provided with no disciplined routine to keep them mentally stable.

My grandmothers’  vulnerability – and their inability to make decisions about their own care – was no justification for withdrawing treatment from them – Labour introduced the Mental Capacity Act to try and protect them from this neglect. I feel like crying when I think about it.

When you leave your mother or grandmother in hospital, you trust that the doctors and nurses will look after them. The next thing you hear is that she is dead. You may be shocked, you may be sad, but in the case of both my grandmothers I was angry.

The NHS as a state run monopoly is over 50 years old - is it time to change?

I still have not forgiven the staff on the geriatric wards for the way my grandmothers suffered. It was as if they simply didn’t care. They see old people come in alive and go out dead every day, perhaps they have become desensitized to aging and death. As I write this, I’m worrying that my granddad might get a hospital bug or die from lack of fluids. Tony Blair said their needs to be more input from market forces into the NHS. I think he was right, and I’ll tell you why.

There are several hospitals close to where my grandparents lived; Royal Glamorgan, Dewi Sant, Llwynipia, and Prince Charles.Whenever someone in Pontypridd hears that their grandparent is going to Dewi Sant they fear the worst. We hear about all the people who died shortly after going there.

What if there was competition between the hospitals, and you could choose which hospital you wanted the NHS to pay for your grandparent to go to? No-one would want them to be sent to Dewi Sant! The Pontypridd and Llantrsiant Observer and Rhondda Leader both run columns headed “Look who’s been in court”. Imagine if they added a ‘Look who’s died in hospital column’ each time someone died of a problem caused by negligence. Just like most businesses worry that bad publicity could result in them losing clients, hospitals would worry about a drop in the number of patient admissions.

One of my friends on Facebook said she was a satisfied customer of the AA, who arrived promptly and resolved the problem with her car efficiently and effectively. The AA knows that if it provides a bad service, making the customer wait 2.5 hours to be seen (as patients do in A&E) it would lose customers to its competitors, such as the RAC or Green Flag.

I’m not saying there should different providers of state health insurance, as there is in Belgium, for example. But I think we should be able to take our European Health Insurance Card to any hospital in the EU and be treated on the same terms as in the UK.

If this were already in place, my family could have made a choice between taking my maternal grandmother to the Royal Gwent (where she may have lived) instead of the Royal Glamorgan (where she died). In the case of my paternal grandmother it could have meant taking her to Clinique Fond Roy in Uccle in Belgium, instead of Llwynypia.

Aneurin Bevan is an inspiration of what can be done if people are willing to have the courage of their convictions and do what they think is right and fair.. He stood up for what he believed in. To the best of my knowledge, I think he resigned from the government because they didn’t agree with his ideas on nationalisation. I don’t believe in nationalisation or privatisation. I believe that the privately owned and run utilities, and State-owned and run public services, should gradually give up control to the public, who would form co-operatives and take back control of their lives. I wouldn’t resign in his position just because I couldn’t get my way, as my time on the local councils Llantwit Fardre and Pontypridd prove. I would only resign if my party tried to force me to lie or say what I don’t believe in. Even so, so long as there was due process I would vote with my party’s consensus.

If Royal Glamorgan Hospital was a co-operative, my family and I would be shareholders, and we if we were to learn that my grandmother died from neglect, we would be able to get help from the other members of the public to have the management removed if they didn’t dismiss the doctor or nurse whose negligence led to her death.

I think Aneurin Bevan was one of the strongest politicians – providing everyone rich or poor with access to free healthcare. But he wasn’t the first to come up with the idea of giving everyone access to not-for-profit healthcare. Bupa was founded in 1947, a year before the NHS was founded.

My father, who had a very modest education, and came from a mining family in the Rhondda, first trained as a carpenter, and has worked his way up in the construction industry for the last 54 years. He works in the private sector, but most of his work is for the public sector. Some of his great achievements have included making toilets for disabled users in Royal Glamorgan Hospital accessible to people in wheelchairs without them needing the help of a nurse.

His firm was in the private sector, and the government paid it to deliver their promises for better hospitals and greater equality. Earlier in his career, he was made redundant from a firm that had provided a key staff benefit: private health insurance. You may think I’m privileged to have access to private healthcare through my father’s employer, but I know I was lucky. Because we had private health insurance, I was able to be seen by an epilepsy consultant in Bristol, when I lived in Pontypridd. At the time, we heard unproven rumours that lots of people with epilepsy were dying in the Heath Hospital in Cardiff from botched surgery. I don’t know whether it was true, but I was glad I didn’t have to go there.

What would Aneurin Bevan have to say about this? – I don’t think he’d be angry with my dad for having insurance with a not-for-profit healthcare provider instead of using one paid for by the Government. But I do think he would be very angry, fuming, disgusted and appalled that his NHS was so neglectful and limiting the choice and rights to free movement that the people he set it up to help are democratically and constitutionally entitled to.

The company that made my dad redundant terminated our private health insurance cover when I was halfway through a programme of surgery to make my epilepsy more manageable. This surgery was very important to me because in the days before the Disability Discrimination Act was extended to cover education the university I was attending refused to put their lecture notes onto the internet for me to access at home. If successful, the surgery would me I could work for my degree without having to be in the medical centre or at home all the time. I needed the surgery urgently. If I didn’t have it I could have died from a grand mal attack, and if I didn’t have it privately I would have been placed on a waiting list (and I also feared I there was a risk I could die from botched surgery at one of the aforementioned hospitals).

My father convinced the directors of the company he set up to club together to pay for a group private health insurance scheme for their families, so he could get me the surgery I needed. I had the surgery and I don’t have as many seizures as I used to, but I still can’t learn to drive (as I need to live for a full year without a seizure to qualify for a driving license). Private health insurance has also paid for treatment of my bad back, which the government and the Health Trusts believe is not a priority so I couldn’t have it paid for by the NHS..

Under a private healthcare scheme, consultants charge the private company that is running the scheme around £175 for a first consultation. After the consultation the consultant tells your GP what you need. If you need medication, the GP will prescribe it and the NHS will pay for it. People without private health insurance probably don’t know, that if the doctor consultant provided to you by the NHS is not providing you with what you feel is an acceptable standard of care, you can pay £175 to be seen by a private sector consultant, and you GP will have to follow their instructions, not the State-funded consultants instructions. Furthermore, private sector doctors don’t need to worry about how much your medicines cost, as they don’t pay it, but doctors who are funded through the NHS are made (wrongly, in my opinion) to worry about cost and targets. This is only likely to get worse for patients in England under the Conservatives.

Members of the Labour Party probably share my disgust about the manner in which healthcare is provided in the UK. Why should patients have to pay twice over to receive the standard of healthcare that we require? Aneurin Bevan would be turning in his grave if he knew that both my grandmothers died unnecessarily, that the only reason I’m still alive today is because my dad landed a good job with private healthcare cover, and that it’s only because my dad’s private sector business partners were willing to give up some of their profits that I didn’t die from having a seizure, or because of a botched operation.

I don’t think anyone should have to pay for private healthcare. My dad has now retired, so I’m panicking now about where I am going to find the money to pay for private healthcare so that I can still be treated for my back problems, my epilepsy, my osteoporosis, non-invasive urology treatment, and other conditions that the politicians are stopping or restricting the NHS from paying for.

Aneurin Bevan would surely be ashamed of the current Labour Party, that allows people to die unnecessarily in hospitals that aren’t set-up properly for patients’ needs, because of all the bureaucracy they and the Tories created, resulting in so many unnecessary pen-pushing NHS Trust managers, costing money that could be better spent on patient care.

Now the Tories are saying they want to hand the spending power to over to GPs. Are they serious? Every GP swears an oath saying they will not taking financial considerations into account when recommending treatment to patients.! Giving powers to GPs over spending will mean that every time they treat a patient doctors will be breaking the promise they made when they qualified.

Those of us with private healthcare can ask our GP to refer us to any consultant at any hospital in the UK. I want everyone in the UK to have this right. My aunt lived in Scotland where she died of cancer. I know the hospital did the best it could for her, but I still wonder whether, had she had been married to my dad instead of my uncle, would she still be alive today?

Many people will understand the emotions I’m feeling right now. The anger about my grandmothers’ unnecessary deaths, the worries about my grandfather’s health, and the fear that if I can’t find money to pay for private health insurance that my own conditions may not be treated correctly in the future. Will I be forced to choose only to have those treatments that are available in State-owned hospitals, or only have the treatment that a consultant paid for by the NHS recommends, even if it is not the one that a private doctor would impartially recommend? For example

Patients living in Great Britain and Northern Ireland deserve free healthcare that is tailored to our needs. It’ that simple. We don’t actually care if our doctor works for the private sector or the public sector, so long as they listen to us, understand us, and do what’s right for us (rather than thinking about how much profit they can make, or how many targets they can meet). We don’t deserve to be on waiting lists. We do deserve the best treatment available provided to us when it is needed.

The French and Germans put their differences behind them after the Second World War, to take the first step to creating a European Union, where everyone would be able to move freely between countries, irrespective of their beliefs. The European Union didn’t exist when Aneurin Bevan was alive. If he were alive today, I have a feeling he would agree with what I’m about to propose.

All the Governments of Europe should come together to create the Supranational Health Service (SNHS). With only having a European Health Insurance Card (EHIC) in our possession (which many of us do already) we and everyone else in Europe should be able to ask our doctors to refer us to a consultant anywhere in the EU, based not on cost, but on medical need.

We shouldn’t need medical travel insurance, nor to deal with a stack of paperwork if we have an accident while on holiday. We should just have to show our EHIC and have the cost of our treatment billed to the NHS. We should be treated exactly the same way as if we were receiving treatment in the UK. Mr Lansley, you can stop the English having free prescriptions, because you won’t accept that your economics have been disproved by the Assembly, but we in Wales should be able to enjoy free prescriptions abroad, not just at home.